Red Paper
International Journal of Paediatrics and Geriatrics

International Journal of Paediatrics and Geriatrics

Login     Signup
Peer Reviewed Journal
Journal is inviting manuscripts for its coming issue. Contact us for more details.

2025, Vol. 8, Issue 2, Part A

Neurodiversity-affirming interventions for ADHD: A comparative effectiveness study
Author(s)
Alejandro Martínez López
Abstract

Background: Conventional ADHD care yields robust short-term symptom reductions, yet gains in quality of life and participation are inconsistent. Neurodiversity-affirming practice centering autonomy, collaborative formulation, and environmental accommodations may enhance patient-valued outcomes without compromising safety.

Methods: We conducted a pragmatic, multicentre, cluster-randomized comparative-effectiveness trial (24-week follow-up) across outpatient child/adult mental-health and affiliated primary-care clinics. Sites were randomized 1: 1 to a neurodiversity-affirming bundle (collaborative assessment; identity-affirming psychoeducation; structured education/workplace accommodations; choice-sensitive use of medication and behavioral skills; clinician training) or guideline-concordant standard care. Participants were adolescents (12-17 y) and adults (18-55 y) with DSM-5-TR ADHD (N=390; bundle n=192; standard care n=198). Co-primary outcomes were change in health-related quality of life (0-100) and functional participation (standardized units). Key secondary outcomes were ADHD symptoms (SD units), therapeutic alliance (0-7), service engagement (≥75% session attendance), and safety. Analyses were intention-to-treat using mixed-effects models; non-inferiority for symptoms was pre-specified (margin 0. 2 SD) and superiority was tested for co-primary outcomes.

Results: The bundle outperformed standard care for quality of life (mean change +12. 4±18. 3 vs +6. 8±17. 9; Δ=+5. 6 points) and functional participation (+0. 62±0. 48 vs +0. 21±0. 44 SD; Δ=+0. 41 SD). Symptom improvement was substantial and met non-inferiority (bundle −0. 91 SD; standard care −0. 84 SD; Δ=−0. 07 SD). Alliance and engagement favored the bundle (alliance +1. 1 vs +0. 6; engagement 82. 0% vs 71. 5%). Safety was comparable with numerically fewer adverse events in the bundle (any AE 18. 2% vs 22. 7%; discontinuation due to AE 2. 6% vs 4. 5%). Benefits were observed in both adolescents and adults.

Conclusions: A structured neurodiversity-affirming intervention bundle yields superior gains in quality of life and functional participation, maintains non-inferior symptom reduction, and improves acceptability and engagement versus guideline-concordant standard care over 24 weeks.Implementing collaborative formulation, accommodation planning, and affirming communication alongside evidence-based medication and skills training represents a pragmatic, safety-compatible enhancement to routine ADHD services.
Pages: 36-42 | Views: 191 | Downloads: 136


International Journal of Paediatrics and Geriatrics
How to cite this article:
Alejandro Martínez López. Neurodiversity-affirming interventions for ADHD: A comparative effectiveness study. Int J Paediatrics Geriatrics 2025;8(2):36-42. DOI: 10.33545/26643685.2025.v8.i2a.268
International Journal of Paediatrics and Geriatrics

International Journal of Paediatrics and Geriatrics

Call for book chapter
International Journal of Paediatrics and Geriatrics